Back to Insights
Sustainability

The carbon cost of marine vs. freshwater fish.

A measured comparison of food-miles, water and emissions across the major Indian protein options.

AB
Anindya Bose
Cold-Chain & Logistics
Feb 2025
11 min
The carbon cost of marine vs. freshwater fish.

A protein's carbon footprint is decided largely by three variables: feed efficiency, food-miles and refrigeration. On all three, locally-stewarded freshwater fish performs meaningfully better than the marine alternatives Kolkata kitchens default to.

1.4
kg CO₂e / kg reserve freshwater
5.6
kg CO₂e / kg imported marine
48 km
average reserve food-miles
2,200 km
average imported marine food-miles

Why the gap is structural

Marine fishing is fuel-intensive (trawlers), refrigeration-intensive (long hauls), and overcaught (longer trips per kilo). Pond aquaculture, run honestly, runs the table on all three.

Key takeaways
  • Reserve freshwater fish has roughly a quarter the carbon footprint of imported marine.
  • The win is driven by short food-miles and lower refrigeration overhead.
  • Industrial aquaculture does not enjoy the same advantage.
Anindya Bose
About the author

Anindya Bose

Cold-Chain & Logistics

Built the four-hour harvest-to-kitchen pipeline serving Kolkata and the suburbs.

The Reserve Brief

One letter a month, no noise.

Get the essay of the month, two field notes and a harvest report — the first Sunday of every month.